Article: Peter Thiel vs. the FDA

Peter Thiel vs. the FDA

http://flip.it/hsrQ15

See, the thing is, before a candidate drug is tested on humans, it’s tested for a very long time on animals, usually mice.  This tells us what the drug is likely to do in a mammalian system.  

It doesn’t tell us what’s going to happen in another species, namely humans.  We’re different from rodents (sometimes).

We can extrapolate that if a compound kills a mouse dead, it would probably kill us too.  But other things, like cognitive effects or things that might take years to appear, may not show up in rodents.

There are enormous risks to fast-tracking drugs.  And there is an alternative: compassionate use.  This is an exception that the FDA can use to release a drug from clinical trials early, if it performs brilliantly and is lifesaving.

As this article points out, the driving factor for forming the FDA in the first place was thalidomide, a very effective anti-morning sickness of pregnancy drug.  The only problem was that many of the women who took it gave birth to severely deformed babies.

Clearly, we must protect people from untested drugs.  Yes, we need solutions to pressing problems.  But we’re not going to get solutions by jumping the tracks.  Like it or not, science is an exacting….science.

Previous Post
Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. Max T Fourd

     /  February 1, 2017

    Screw the pharmas(they own the FDA/DEA)..Herbs work for most things…The pharmas want to ban beneficial herbs…they’re crooks..

    Reply

What's your take?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: